Green Building Technologies

Integration in design is the basis for Green Building Technologies. Only with the integrated in design approach can we develop high performance buildings at affordable prices. Green building technologies is nothing more than a building that is built from reusable materials and other materials that make the building efficient and environmentally friendly.

Furthermore, green building technologies allows us to understand that, building a building that takes advantage of the sun’s location, and is using the latest insulation technology along with the latest window designs should be commonplace. This is not the case.

While understanding what green technology is, it has not caught on and has only begun to get more popular in the recent years. There are several factors to consider when thinking about green building technology. Insulation is a major factor; it is a known fact that insulation plays a major role in building performance. Containing energy in any building can only be done through proper insulation of the ceiling and walls. After all, without proper installation during the summer months all of the air conditioning will leak out, and during the winter months all of the heat will leak out. This causes our devices to work harder while giving less performance.

If the installation is properly installed in a building the larger sized heating and cooling systems can be greatly decreased saving costs, but at the same time maintaining a comfort level for the inhabitants or tenants. Larger heating and cooling systems cost significantly more, work harder, and waste energy, therefore are not environmentally friendly. In this way proving that proper installation is the key point of green building technologies.

Understanding the ventilation system in the integration in design approach has to be taken into consideration. With understanding how air flows inside the building will help in the designer’s ability to design the building to provide maximum circulation which will properly allow optimal comfort for people living or working inside. It is important also to understand that while working on the circulation we also have to understand indoor air quality. The quality of the air is important and installing a state-of-the-art indoor air filtration system will round out the ventilation and air quality design.

Green building technologies also encompass using water resources in the form of rainwater and grey water in storage tanks to be used for flushing toilets or watering plants. Also the invention of waterless technology is becoming more and more popular and in some cases will be used in green building technology. So the preservation of water is as important in shrinking the environmental footprint.

Renewable energy is also important with solar energy topping the list, solar energy can be used for many different things for instance electricity, heating water and cooling water. It is important to understand that in order to use this technology, the proper placement of our green building is important.

And we cannot forget geothermal technologies or geothermal applications in the form of heat exchange systems. These heat exchange systems can effectively heat the building in the winter and cool the building in the summer.

In summary, green building technologies saves money and reduces our need for expendable energy, giving us the ability to decrease our energy consumption and decrease our negative impact on the environment.

Educational Technology Needs a Lesson Plan

I remember feeling very progressive when I purchased my daughter her first educational software, Reader Rabbit, in the early 1990s. Now a 22 year-old college graduate, she and many like her have never known a world without computers. Not only does she use an internet-enabled phone to constantly communicate, but her job as an emergency room nurse requires computer skills as well. So, needless to say, I am a strong proponent of using educational technology, both in the classroom and at home. Whether we like it or not – it’s a part of our daily lives now.

But that is only the first of a couple of reasons I support the use of technology with young children.

A second reason is that the use of educational technology in early education programs tends to level the educational playing field between those who have this access at home and those that do not. Being able to use computers and other technology at school can help all children develop the necessary life-skills needed in our technologically focused society.

Many experts recommend that all early childhood classrooms have an educational technology center that includes a computer, a printer, a digital camera, age-appropriate educational software, and access to the Internet. We would like to suggest that these centers also include a variety of educational DVDs and videos for those students who learn best with the added audio visual element that these mediums provide. Because children learn differently, at different rates, requiring different stimuli, when integrating technology into the lessons, it is important to plan to use all forms of technology – not just a few.

When creating such a technology center, here are some things to remember.

o Technology is not a replacement for the teacher. Technology elements, whether computers or educational DVDs and videos, are merely tools designed to help children learn. The teacher is still the guide.

o Consideration the applicable students’ age, developmental levels, and individual needs when selecting software, videos, and other technology.

o Don’t forget the parents. Collaborate with them and impart the importance of their involvement when their children are watching an educational television program or playing/working with computers.

o Monitor children’s use of all forms of technology that use earphones. Some research suggests that the volume at which children listen to the music can be extremely harmful.

In other words, what educational technology needs, to be properly integrated into the classroom is a good old-fashioned lesson plan.

What Price? Technology

Many alternative health care practitioners are now recommending a detoxification program for most of us over the age of 40. Living in an industrialized society certainly has many benefits in terms of convenience and access to information. There is a plentiful supply of material goods used in the creation of many commercial products including plastics, metals, and other synthetic materials. However, with the manufacturing of such materials, we have the problem of chemical pollution and disposal problems. The toxins we generate threaten our air and water supply. Most well informed people will not even consider drinking unfiltered tap water in our cities.

As a plastic surgeon with over twenty years of experience placing foreign material into people’s bodies, I have also become aware of another form of pollution, namely the placement of multiple implants in the body. How does the body deal with the break down of these foreign materials? I have personal experience with a number of these implant materials; including mercury amalgams, breast implants filled with both saline and silicone, a silicone chin implant, and tattoo pigments for eyeliner. In surgical training we are taught that these implants are inert and in general well tolerated by the body unless the implant becomes secondarily infected.

Unfortunately, this is not necessarily true, and I have come to believe from years of experience dealing with silicone breast implants, that there is probably nothing that you can place in the human body that the body will not attempt to break down. Silicone implants in the body are broken down over time through a lipolysis reaction and the engineering data shows that implants regularly fail either by the contents leaking out or frank rupture of the implant elastomer shell usually within 8 to 15 years. The same implants sitting on the shelf are unaffected for they are not exposed to the enzyme systems, which effect the implants inside the body. Just as the nuclear facilities have found it difficult to find containers to contain nuclear waste, plastic surgeons have found it difficult to find containers that will contain saline or silicone gel or other filler material over time. As we go through life, we are all exposed to a variety of pesticides, heavy metals, plastics of all sorts; from those lining aluminum cans to those present on IV catheters. I wonder just how much foreign material is introduced into the human body over a lifetime.

Also complex biofilms that form around implants, add biotoxins to the list of toxins that the body must eliminate in order not to become ill. Of course, natural detoxification and elimination methods do exist to handle much of this load. However, biochemical analysis of the majority of people in industrialized society show high levels of many substances including aluminum, mercury, lead, and other heavy metals. It is exactly these lab findings that have lead alternative practitioners to recommend detoxification programs.

Some substances are relatively easy to eliminate from the body and others are more difficult. The toxic effects of silicone gel implants is one such difficult dilemma. The silicone gel that leaks out through the capsule is taken up by the macrophages and is distributed throughout the body. We are not only dealing with this silicone gel, but also with the breakdown products including silicate, which can crystallize in nerve tissue. There are a myriad of other chemicals and heavy metals used in the manufacturing process of silicone gel implants including platinum that may be difficult to eliminate from the body.

The chemistry of silicone in the body is not well studied, but we do know that silicone penetrates cell membranes and interferes with enzyme systems. Based on the paucity of information is no wonder that the systemic diseases associated with the widespread dissemination of silicone throughout the body have not yet been carefully studied. From clinical experience, I can tell you that the disease course is very similar in many of the woman that I see for explanations. It appears that the severity of the disease does correlate with the amount of time that the silicone has been leaking out of the implants. If this process has been occurring for more than ten years, the detoxification process, including the removal of the implants, is less likely to restore the patient to full health than if the implants are removed prior to this time.

In some patients, we also have a complicating factor of a coating of polyurethane placed around the implants, which disassociates itself from the implant and is embedded in the scar capsule surrounding the implant. The break down products of polyurethane are felt to be carcinogenic and the mechanism of the disposal of these products is not yet well defined. Clinically, these women have a different illness than the woman with pure silicone gel leakage. Implant removal often results in a dramatic improvement in their symptoms, provided that the scar capsules with the embedded polyurethane are totally removed.

There is a theory that it is the cumulative effect of these toxins that leads to the free radical formation and subsequent accelerated aging that appears to occur after the age of forty. A whole science of anti-aging theories and technologies is currently being developed. Advanced methods exist to eliminate the free radicals and detoxify the body of a number of chemicals, heavy metals and other contaminants within the body. It is well established that certain conditions within the bowels can lead to “leaky gut” syndrome and allow large molecules to enter the body and produce autoimmune reactions that may affect the joints and other tissues. Given the rapid reversal of arthralgias and conditions such as bursitis after removal of leaking silicone gel implants, and knowing what we know about silicone acting as an adjuvant in the immune system, I feel that we have much to learn about the mechanism of autoimmune disease in relationship to these foreign substances.

The Gulf War syndrome is another example of this with a possible etiology being the adjuvant “squalene” as the initiating agent of this syndrome. The Gulf War syndrome has many characteristics similar to silicone immune dysfunction including not only the autoimmune, but also the neurological components. Could these foreign materials that we introduce to our bodies through vaccines, implants, prosthesis, and ingestion of contaminated food and water sources be contributing to the epidemic of autoimmune disease that we are seeing in our society? Of course, many links have been made toxic chemicals, which are carcinogenic. Detoxification programs including chelation therapy, removal of mercury amalgams, and restoration of gut intestinal flora with elimination of pathogenic flora are a standard treatment of cancer in Europe. We should also consider the epidemic of cardiovascular disease in this country. Heart disease is associated with free radical damage to the heart vessels and does respond to methods that will eliminate free radicals such as chelation therapy. And what of immune dysfunction in general with the variety of viral, bacterial and fungal infections that affect our population? A healthy immune system can not exist if foreign chemicals, heavy metals, and nutritional deficiencies are constantly bombarding it.

It is not what we know, but what we do not know about the effect of this multitude of chemicals, plastics (including silicone), metals, drugs and their metabolites to which we expose our bodies. What are the effects on enzyme systems, cell membranes, DNA damage and interference with repair mechanisms, and the effect on mitochondria energy production? No wonder we currently have epidemics of energy disorders such as fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, and atypical autoimmune diseases, which evade traditional medical understanding.

Take a moment to survey your own life style choices; including dental amalgams, implants, internal prosthetic devices, suture material left within the body, tattoos, hair pigments, personal care products such as shampoos, conditioners, deodorants and antiperspirants, after shave lotions, perfumes, and cosmetics, residue from dry cleaning, food additives, drugs and their break down products, and chemical contamination of our food, air and water sources. It is clear that since vast numbers of these contaminants gain access to our bodies, we should encourage government and academic research institutions to study the science of detoxification. It is imperative to prevent contamination as well as to help speed the removal of contaminants from the human body. How many of the degenerative diseases including heart disease, arthritis and cancer are truly preventable given the proper technology of detoxification and education for prevention? How many dollars do we spend every year treating these diseases and what is the cost to society when so many of our citizens are disabled by these conditions? What price are we paying and what price will our children pay?

If this research is not supported, and our government and regulatory agencies do not take the responsibility of passing legislation that will protect us from the chemical pollution of our air, water and food supplies, then WHO will protect us?